Percolate Query

Percolate queries are also known as Persistent queries, Prospective search, document routing, search in reverse, and inverse search.

The traditional way of conducting searches involves storing documents and performing search queries against them. However, there are cases where we want to apply a query to a newly incoming document to signal a match. Some scenarios where this is desired include monitoring systems that collect data and notify users about specific events, such as reaching a certain threshold for a metric or a particular value appearing in the monitored data. Another example is news aggregation, where users may want to be notified only about certain categories or topics, or even specific "keywords."

In these situations, traditional search is not the best fit, as it assumes the desired search is performed over the entire collection. This process gets multiplied by the number of users, resulting in many queries running over the entire collection, which can cause significant additional load. The alternative approach described in this section involves storing the queries instead and testing them against an incoming new document or a batch of documents.

Google Alerts, AlertHN, Bloomberg Terminal, and other systems that allow users to subscribe to specific content utilize similar technology.

Performing a percolate query with CALL PQ

The key thing to remember about percolate queries is that your search queries are already in the table. What you need to provide are documents to check if any of them match any of the stored rules.

You can perform a percolate query via SQL or JSON interfaces, as well as using programming language clients. The SQL approach offers more flexibility, while the HTTP method is simpler and provides most of what you need. The table below can help you understand the differences.

Desired Behavior SQL HTTP PHP
Provide a single document CALL PQ('tbl', '{doc1}') query.percolate.document{doc1} $client->pq()->search([$percolate])
Provide a single document (alternative) CALL PQ('tbl', 'doc1', 0 as docs_json) -
Provide multiple documents CALL PQ('tbl', ('doc1', 'doc2'), 0 as docs_json) query.percolate.documents[{doc1}, {doc2}] $client->pq()->search([$percolate])
Provide multiple documents (alternative) CALL PQ('tbl', ('{doc1}', '{doc2}')) - -
Provide multiple documents (alternative) CALL PQ('tbl', '[{doc1}, {doc2}]') - -
Return matching document ids 0/1 as docs (disabled by default) Enabled by default Enabled by default
Use document's own id to show in the result 'id field' as docs_id (disabled by default) Not available Not available
Consider input documents are JSON 1 as docs_json (1 by default) Enabled by default Enabled by default
Consider input documents are plain text 0 as docs_json (1 by default) Not available Not available
Sparsed distribution mode default default default
Sharded distribution mode sharded as mode Not available Not available
Return all info about matching query 1 as query (0 by default) Enabled by default Enabled by default
Skip invalid JSON 1 as skip_bad_json (0 by default) Not available Not available
Extended info in SHOW META 1 as verbose (0 by default) Not available Not available
Define the number which will be added to document ids if no docs_id fields provided (mostly relevant in distributed PQ modes) 1 as shift (0 by default) Not available Not available

To demonstrate how this works, here are a few examples. Let's create a PQ table with two fields:

  • title (text)
  • color (string)

and three rules in it:

  • Just full-text. Query: @title bag
  • Full-text and filtering. Query: @title shoes. Filters: color='red'
  • Full-text and more complex filtering. Query: @title shoes. Filters: color IN('blue', 'green')
‹›
  • SQL
  • JSON
  • PHP
  • Python
  • javascript
  • Java
  • C#
  • TypeScript
  • Go
📋
CREATE TABLE products(title text, color string) type='pq';
INSERT INTO products(query) values('@title bag');
INSERT INTO products(query,filters) values('@title shoes', 'color=\'red\'');
INSERT INTO products(query,filters) values('@title shoes', 'color in (\'blue\', \'green\')');
select * from products;
‹›
Response
+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| id                  | query        | tags | filters                   |
+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| 1657852401006149635 | @title shoes |      | color IN ('blue, 'green') |
| 1657852401006149636 | @title shoes |      | color='red'               |
| 1657852401006149637 | @title bag   |      |                           |
+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
Just tell me what PQ rules match my single document

The first document doesn't match any rules. It could match the first two, but they require additional filters.

The second document matches one rule. Note that CALL PQ by default expects a document to be a JSON, but if you use 0 as docs_json, you can pass a plain string instead.

‹›
  • SQL
  • JSON
  • PHP
  • Python
  • javascript
  • Java
  • C#
  • TypeScript
  • Go
📋
CALL PQ('products', 'Beautiful shoes', 0 as docs_json);

CALL PQ('products', 'What a nice bag', 0 as docs_json);
CALL PQ('products', '{"title": "What a nice bag"}');
‹›
Response
+---------------------+
| id                  |
+---------------------+
| 1657852401006149637 |
+---------------------+

+---------------------+
| id                  |
+---------------------+
| 1657852401006149637 |
+---------------------+
I want to know complete PQ rules matching my document
‹›
  • SQL
  • JSON
  • PHP
  • Python
  • javascript
  • Java
  • C#
  • TypeScript
  • Go
📋
CALL PQ('products', '{"title": "What a nice bag"}', 1 as query);
‹›
Response
+---------------------+------------+------+---------+
| id                  | query      | tags | filters |
+---------------------+------------+------+---------+
| 1657852401006149637 | @title bag |      |         |
+---------------------+------------+------+---------+
How about multiple documents?

Note that with CALL PQ, you can provide multiple documents in different ways:

  • as an array of plain documents in round brackets ('doc1', 'doc2'). This requires 0 as docs_json
  • as an array of JSONs in round brackets ('{doc1}', '{doc2}')
  • or as a standard JSON array '[{doc1}, {doc2}]'
‹›
  • SQL
  • JSON
  • PHP
  • Python
  • javascript
  • Java
  • C#
  • TypeScript
  • Go
📋
CALL PQ('products', ('nice pair of shoes', 'beautiful bag'), 1 as query, 0 as docs_json);

CALL PQ('products', ('{"title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "red"}', '{"title": "beautiful bag"}'), 1 as query);

CALL PQ('products', '[{"title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "blue"}, {"title": "beautiful bag"}]', 1 as query);
‹›
Response
+---------------------+------------+------+---------+
| id                  | query      | tags | filters |
+---------------------+------------+------+---------+
| 1657852401006149637 | @title bag |      |         |
+---------------------+------------+------+---------+

+---------------------+--------------+------+-------------+
| id                  | query        | tags | filters     |
+---------------------+--------------+------+-------------+
| 1657852401006149636 | @title shoes |      | color='red' |
| 1657852401006149637 | @title bag   |      |             |
+---------------------+--------------+------+-------------+

+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| id                  | query        | tags | filters                   |
+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| 1657852401006149635 | @title shoes |      | color IN ('blue, 'green') |
| 1657852401006149637 | @title bag   |      |                           |
+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
I want to know what docs match what rules

Using the option 1 as docs allows you to see which documents of the provided ones match which rules.

‹›
  • SQL
  • JSON
  • PHP
  • Python
  • javascript
  • Java
  • C#
  • TypeScript
  • Go
📋
CALL PQ('products', '[{"title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "blue"}, {"title": "beautiful bag"}]', 1 as query, 1 as docs);
‹›
Response
+---------------------+-----------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| id                  | documents | query        | tags | filters                   |
+---------------------+-----------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| 1657852401006149635 | 1         | @title shoes |      | color IN ('blue, 'green') |
| 1657852401006149637 | 2         | @title bag   |      |                           |
+---------------------+-----------+--------------+------+---------------------------+

Static ids

By default, matching document ids correspond to their relative numbers in the list you provide. However, in some cases, each document already has its own id. For this case, there's an option 'id field name' as docs_id for CALL PQ.

Note that if the id cannot be found by the provided field name, the PQ rule will not be shown in the results.

This option is only available for CALL PQ via SQL.

‹›
  • SQL
SQL
📋
CALL PQ('products', '[{"id": 123, "title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "blue"}, {"id": 456, "title": "beautiful bag"}]', 1 as query, 'id' as docs_id, 1 as docs);
‹›
Response
+---------------------+-----------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| id                  | documents | query        | tags | filters                   |
+---------------------+-----------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| 1657852401006149664 | 456       | @title bag   |      |                           |
| 1657852401006149666 | 123       | @title shoes |      | color IN ('blue, 'green') |
+---------------------+-----------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
I may have invalid JSONs, please skip them

When using CALL PQ with separate JSONs, you can use the option 1 as skip_bad_json to skip any invalid JSONs in the input. In the example below, the 2nd query fails due to an invalid JSON, but the 3rd query avoids the error by using 1 as skip_bad_json. Keep in mind that this option is not available when sending JSON queries over HTTP, as the whole JSON query must be valid in that case.

‹›
  • SQL
SQL
📋
CALL PQ('products', ('{"title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "blue"}', '{"title": "beautiful bag"}'));

CALL PQ('products', ('{"title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "blue"}', '{"title": "beautiful bag}'));

CALL PQ('products', ('{"title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "blue"}', '{"title": "beautiful bag}'), 1 as skip_bad_json);
‹›
Response
+---------------------+
| id                  |
+---------------------+
| 1657852401006149635 |
| 1657852401006149637 |
+---------------------+

ERROR 1064 (42000): Bad JSON objects in strings: 2

+---------------------+
| id                  |
+---------------------+
| 1657852401006149635 |
+---------------------+
I want higher performance of a percolate query

Percolate queries are designed with high throughput and large data volumes in mind. To optimize performance for lower latency and higher throughput, consider the following.

There are two modes of distribution for a percolate table and how a percolate query can work against it:

  • Sparse (default). Ideal for: many documents, mirrored PQ tables. When your document set is large but the set of queries stored in the PQ table is small, the sparse mode is beneficial. In this mode, the batch of documents you pass will be divided among the number of agents, so each node processes only a portion of the documents from your request. Manticore splits your document set and distributes chunks among the mirrors. Once the agents have finished processing the queries, Manticore collects and merges the results, returning a final query set as if it came from a single table. Use replication to assist the process.
  • Sharded. Ideal for: many PQ rules, rules split among PQ tables. In this mode, the entire document set is broadcast to all tables of the distributed PQ table without initially splitting the documents. This is beneficial when pushing a relatively small set of documents, but the number of stored queries is large. In this case, it's more appropriate to store only a portion of PQ rules on each node and then merge the results returned from the nodes that process the same set of documents against different sets of PQ rules. This mode must be explicitly set, as it implies an increase in network payload and expects tables with different PQs, which replication cannot do out-of-the-box.

Assume you have table pq_d2 defined as:

table pq_d2
{
    type = distributed
    agent = 127.0.0.1:6712:pq
    agent = 127.0.0.1:6712:ptitle
}

Each of 'pq' and 'ptitle' contains:

‹›
  • SQL
  • JSON
  • PHP
  • Python
  • javascript
  • Java
  • C#
  • TypeScript
  • Go
📋
SELECT * FROM pq;
‹›
Response
+------+-------------+------+-------------------+
| id   | query       | tags | filters           |
+------+-------------+------+-------------------+
|    1 | filter test |      | gid>=10           |
|    2 | angry       |      | gid>=10 OR gid<=3 |
+------+-------------+------+-------------------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)

And you execute CALL PQ on the distributed table with a couple of documents.

‹›
  • SQL
  • JSON
  • PHP
  • Python
  • javascript
  • Java
  • C#
  • TypeScript
  • Go
📋
CALL PQ ('pq_d2', ('{"title":"angry test", "gid":3 }', '{"title":"filter test doc2", "gid":13}'), 1 AS docs);
‹›
Response
+------+-----------+
| id   | documents |
+------+-----------+
|    1 | 2         |
|    2 | 1         |
+------+-----------+

In the previous example, we used the default sparse mode. To demonstrate the sharded mode, let's create a distributed PQ table consisting of 2 local PQ tables and add 2 documents to "products1" and 1 document to "products2":

create table products1(title text, color string) type='pq';
create table products2(title text, color string) type='pq';
create table products_distributed type='distributed' local='products1' local='products2';

INSERT INTO products1(query) values('@title bag');
INSERT INTO products1(query,filters) values('@title shoes', 'color=\'red\'');
INSERT INTO products2(query,filters) values('@title shoes', 'color in (\'blue\', \'green\')');

Now, if you add 'sharded' as mode to CALL PQ, it will send the documents to all the agent's tables (in this case, just local tables, but they can be remote to utilize external hardware). This mode is not available via the JSON interface.

‹›
  • SQL
SQL
📋
CALL PQ('products_distributed', ('{"title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "blue"}', '{"title": "beautiful bag"}'), 'sharded' as mode, 1 as query);
‹›
Response
+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| id                  | query        | tags | filters                   |
+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+
| 1657852401006149639 | @title bag   |      |                           |
| 1657852401006149643 | @title shoes |      | color IN ('blue, 'green') |
+---------------------+--------------+------+---------------------------+

Note that the syntax of agent mirrors in the configuration (when several hosts are assigned to one agent line, separated with |) has nothing to do with the CALL PQ query mode. Each agent always represents one node, regardless of the number of HA mirrors specified for that agent.

How can I learn more about performance?

In some cases, you might want to get more details about the performance of a percolate query. For that purpose, there is the option 1 as verbose, which is only available via SQL and allows you to save more performance metrics. You can see them using the SHOW META query, which you can run after CALL PQ. See SHOW META for more info.

‹›
  • 1 as verbose
  • 0 as verbose
📋
CALL PQ('products', ('{"title": "nice pair of shoes", "color": "blue"}', '{"title": "beautiful bag"}'), 1 as verbose); show meta;
‹›
Response
+---------------------+
| id                  |
+---------------------+
| 1657852401006149644 |
| 1657852401006149646 |
+---------------------+
+-------------------------+-----------+
| Name                    | Value     |
+-------------------------+-----------+
| Total                   | 0.000 sec |
| Setup                   | 0.000 sec |
| Queries matched         | 2         |
| Queries failed          | 0         |
| Document matched        | 2         |
| Total queries stored    | 3         |
| Term only queries       | 3         |
| Fast rejected queries   | 0         |
| Time per query          | 27, 10    |
| Time of matched queries | 37        |
+-------------------------+-----------+

Autocomplete

Autocomplete (or word completion) is a feature in which an application predicts the rest of a word a user is typing. On websites, it's used in search boxes, where a user starts to type a word, and a dropdown with suggestions pops up so the user can select the ending from the list.

Autocomplete

There are a few ways you can do autocomplete in Manticore:

Autocomplete a sentence

To autocomplete a sentence, you can use infixed search. You can find endings of a document's field by providing its beginning and:

  • using full-text operators * to match anything it substitutes
  • and optionally ^ to start from the beginning of the field
  • and perhaps "" for phrase matching
  • and optionally highlight the results so you don't have to fetch them in full to your application

There is an article about it in our blog and an interactive course. A quick example is:

  • Let's assume you have a document: My cat loves my dog. The cat (Felis catus) is a domestic species of small carnivorous mammal.
  • Then you can use ^, "", and * so as the user is typing, you make queries like: ^"m*", ^"my *", ^"my c*", ^"my ca*" and so on
  • It will find the document, and if you also do highlighting, you will get something like: <strong>My cat</strong> loves my dog. The cat ( ...
Autocomplete a word

In some cases, all you need is to autocomplete a single word or a couple of words. In this case, you can use CALL KEYWORDS.

CALL KEYWORDS

CALL KEYWORDS is available through the SQL interface and offers a way to examine how keywords are tokenized or to obtain the tokenized forms of specific keywords. If the table enables infixes, it allows you to quickly find possible endings for given keywords, making it suitable for autocomplete functionality.

This is a great alternative to general infixed search, as it provides higher performance since it only needs the table's dictionary, not the documents themselves.

General syntax

CALL KEYWORDS(text, table [, options])

The CALL KEYWORDS statement divides text into keywords. It returns the tokenized and normalized forms of the keywords, and if desired, keyword statistics. Additionally, it provides the position of each keyword in the query and all forms of tokenized keywords when the table enables lemmatizers.

Parameter Description
text Text to break down to keywords
table Name of the table from which to take the text processing settings
0/1 as stats Show statistics of keywords, default is 0
0/1 as fold_wildcards Fold wildcards, default is 0
0/1 as fold_lemmas Fold morphological lemmas, default is 0
0/1 as fold_blended Fold blended words, default is 0
N as expansion_limit Override expansion_limit defined in the server configuration, default is 0 (use value from the configuration)
docs/hits as sort_mode Sort output results by either 'docs' or 'hits'. Default no sorting

The examples show how it works if assuming the user is trying to get an autocomplete for "my cat ...". So on the application side all you need to do is to suggest the user the endings from the column "normalized" for each new word. It often makes sense to sort by hits or docs using 'hits' as sort_mode or 'docs' as sort_mode.

‹›
  • Examples
Examples
📋
MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('m*', 't', 1 as stats);
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| 1    | m*        | my         | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | m*        | mammal     | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+

MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('my*', 't', 1 as stats);
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| 1    | my*       | my         | 1    | 2    |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+

MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('c*', 't', 1 as stats, 'hits' as sort_mode);
+------+-----------+-------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized  | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+-------------+------+------+
| 1    | c*        | cat         | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | c*        | carnivorous | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | c*        | catus       | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+-------------+------+------+

MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('ca*', 't', 1 as stats, 'hits' as sort_mode);
+------+-----------+-------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized  | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+-------------+------+------+
| 1    | ca*       | cat         | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | ca*       | carnivorous | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | ca*       | catus       | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+-------------+------+------+

MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('cat*', 't', 1 as stats, 'hits' as sort_mode);
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| 1    | cat*      | cat        | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | cat*      | catus      | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+

There is a nice trick how you can improve the above algorithm - use bigram_index. When you have it enabled for the table what you get in it is not just a single word, but each pair of words standing one after another indexed as a separate token.

This allows to predict not just the current word's ending, but the next word too which is especially beneficial for the purpose of autocomplete.

‹›
  • Examples
Examples
📋
MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('m*', 't', 1 as stats, 'hits' as sort_mode);
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| 1    | m*        | my         | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | m*        | mammal     | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | m*        | my cat     | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | m*        | my dog     | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+

MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('my*', 't', 1 as stats, 'hits' as sort_mode);
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| 1    | my*       | my         | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | my*       | my cat     | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | my*       | my dog     | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+

MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('c*', 't', 1 as stats, 'hits' as sort_mode);
+------+-----------+--------------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized         | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+--------------------+------+------+
| 1    | c*        | cat                | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | c*        | carnivorous        | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | c*        | carnivorous mammal | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | c*        | cat felis          | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | c*        | cat loves          | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | c*        | catus              | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | c*        | catus is           | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+--------------------+------+------+

MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('ca*', 't', 1 as stats, 'hits' as sort_mode);
+------+-----------+--------------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized         | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+--------------------+------+------+
| 1    | ca*       | cat                | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | ca*       | carnivorous        | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | ca*       | carnivorous mammal | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | ca*       | cat felis          | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | ca*       | cat loves          | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | ca*       | catus              | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | ca*       | catus is           | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+--------------------+------+------+

MySQL [(none)]> CALL KEYWORDS('cat*', 't', 1 as stats, 'hits' as sort_mode);
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| qpos | tokenized | normalized | docs | hits |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+
| 1    | cat*      | cat        | 1    | 2    |
| 1    | cat*      | cat felis  | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | cat*      | cat loves  | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | cat*      | catus      | 1    | 1    |
| 1    | cat*      | catus is   | 1    | 1    |
+------+-----------+------------+------+------+

CALL KEYWORDS supports distributed tables so no matter how big your data set you can benefit from using it.

Spell correction

Spell correction, also known as:

  • Auto correction
  • Text correction
  • Fixing spelling errors
  • Typo tolerance
  • "Did you mean?"

and so on, is a software functionality that suggests alternatives to or makes automatic corrections of the text you have typed in. The concept of correcting typed text dates back to the 1960s when computer scientist Warren Teitelman, who also invented the "undo" command, introduced a philosophy of computing called D.W.I.M., or "Do What I Mean." Instead of programming computers to accept only perfectly formatted instructions, Teitelman argued that they should be programmed to recognize obvious mistakes.

The first well-known product to provide spell correction functionality was Microsoft Word 6.0, released in 1993.

How it works

There are a few ways spell correction can be done, but it's important to note that there is no purely programmatic way to convert your mistyped "ipone" into "iphone" with decent quality. Mostly, there has to be a dataset the system is based on. The dataset can be:

  • A dictionary of properly spelled words, which in turn can be:
    • Based on your real data. The idea here is that, for the most part, the spelling in the dictionary made up of your data is correct, and the system tries to find a word that is most similar to the typed word (we'll discuss how this can be done with Manticore shortly).
    • Or it can be based on an external dictionary unrelated to your data. The issue that may arise here is that your data and the external dictionary can be too different: some words may be missing in the dictionary, while others may be missing in your data.
  • Not just dictionary-based, but also context-aware, e.g., "white ber" would be corrected to "white bear," while "dark ber" would be corrected to "dark beer." The context might not just be a neighboring word in your query, but also your location, time of day, the current sentence's grammar (to change "there" to "their" or not), your search history, and virtually any other factors that can affect your intent.
  • Another classic approach is to use previous search queries as the dataset for spell correction. This is even more utilized in autocomplete functionality but makes sense for autocorrect too. The idea is that users are mostly right with spelling, so we can use words from their search history as a source of truth, even if we don't have the words in our documents or use an external dictionary. Context-awareness is also possible here.

Manticore provides the commands CALL QSUGGEST and CALL SUGGEST that can be used for automatic spell correction purposes.

CALL QSUGGEST, CALL SUGGEST

Both commands are available via SQL only, and the general syntax is:

CALL QSUGGEST(word, table [,options])
CALL SUGGEST(word, table [,options])

options: N as option_name[, M as another_option, ...]

These commands provide all suggestions from the dictionary for a given word. They work only on tables with infixing enabled and dict=keywords. They return the suggested keywords, Levenshtein distance between the suggested and original keywords, and the document statistics of the suggested keyword.

If the first parameter contains multiple words, then:

  • CALL QSUGGEST will return suggestions only for the last word, ignoring the rest.
  • CALL SUGGEST will return suggestions only for the first word.

That's the only difference between them. Several options are supported for customization:

Option Description Default
limit Returns N top matches 5
max_edits Keeps only dictionary words with a Levenshtein distance less than or equal to N 4
result_stats Provides Levenshtein distance and document count of the found words 1 (enabled)
delta_len Keeps only dictionary words with a length difference less than N 3
max_matches Number of matches to keep 25
reject Rejected words are matches that are not better than those already in the match queue. They are put in a rejected queue that gets reset in case one actually can go in the match queue. This parameter defines the size of the rejected queue (as reject*max(max_matched,limit)). If the rejected queue is filled, the engine stops looking for potential matches 4
result_line alternate mode to display the data by returning all suggests, distances and docs each per one row 0
non_char do not skip dictionary words with non alphabet symbols 0 (skip such words)
sentence Returns the original sentence along with the last word replaced by the matched one. 0 (do not return the full sentence)

To show how it works, let's create a table and add a few documents to it.

create table products(title text) min_infix_len='2';
insert into products values (0,'Crossbody Bag with Tassel'), (0,'microfiber sheet set'), (0,'Pet Hair Remover Glove');
Single word example

As you can see, the mistyped word "crossbUdy" gets corrected to "crossbody". By default, CALL SUGGEST/QSUGGEST return:

  • distance - the Levenshtein distance which means how many edits they had to make to convert the given word to the suggestion
  • docs - number of documents containing the suggested word

To disable the display of these statistics, you can use the option 0 as result_stats.

‹›
  • Example
Example
📋
call suggest('crossbudy', 'products');
‹›
Response
+-----------+----------+------+
| suggest   | distance | docs |
+-----------+----------+------+
| crossbody | 1        | 1    |
+-----------+----------+------+
CALL SUGGEST takes only the first word

If the first parameter is not a single word, but multiple, then CALL SUGGEST will return suggestions only for the first word.

‹›
  • Example
Example
📋
call suggest('bagg with tasel', 'products');
‹›
Response
+---------+----------+------+
| suggest | distance | docs |
+---------+----------+------+
| bag     | 1        | 1    |
+---------+----------+------+
CALL QSUGGEST takes only the last word

If the first parameter is not a single word, but multiple, then CALL SUGGEST will return suggestions only for the last word.

‹›
  • Example
Example
📋
CALL QSUGGEST('bagg with tasel', 'products');
‹›
Response
+---------+----------+------+
| suggest | distance | docs |
+---------+----------+------+
| tassel  | 1        | 1    |
+---------+----------+------+

Adding 1 as sentence makes CALL QSUGGEST return the entire sentence with the last word corrected.

‹›
  • Example
Example
📋
CALL QSUGGEST('bag with tasel', 'products', 1 as sentence);
‹›
Response
+-------------------+----------+------+
| suggest           | distance | docs |
+-------------------+----------+------+
| bag with tassel   | 1        | 1    |
+-------------------+----------+------+
Different display mode

The 1 as result_line option changes the way the suggestions are displayed in the output. Instead of showing each suggestion in a separate row, it displays all suggestions, distances, and docs in a single row. Here's an example to demonstrate this:

Interactive course

This interactive course demonstrates online how the spell correction feature works on a web page and experiment with different examples.

Typical flow with Manticore and a database